
Latest Views
Nullify Now: Will states defend their inhabitants against Obama's NDAA kidnappings?
,
Itching for War: Obama Admin Claims Iran Willing to Attack US
Feb 1, 2012
And if you buy this from Establishment Puppet Barack Obama, he also has a few disappeared NYC skyscrapers he'd love to sell you.
Really Barack? You really expect us Best and Brightest to believe this obvious war propaganda? LOLs. Your sanctions against Iran aren't even working! If anything they are only further isolating you! This isn't exactly Japan 1941, where an island nation was literally choked off from the world with no alternative but to lash out at their economic aggressors. A nation like Iran laughs at your silly sanctions as it readies thriving trade partnerships with China, Russia and India! So it is easy to see that Iran has zero motive to attack us or anyone else. Plus, Iran hasn't aggressed against another nation in hundreds of years, which is a lot more than you can say!
But your obvious war propaganda does at least demonstrate for us how absolutely desperate you and your military-industrial bosses have become. We only hope that you all aren't so ravenous for your next new war that you will attack innocent Americans again, to blame the atrocity on your next intended target.
Sorry commander; if news comes that Iran attacked somewhere in the US, we will look at you before we will look at them.
Meanwhile, in the Caucus States...
.
.
Israel Shocks World, Endorses Ron Paul Foreign Policy
.
Why Does 'Conservative' Talk Radio Dislike Constitutionalist Ron Paul?
Bain Capital Owns Clear Channel!
In the Spotlight
Journalism's post-9/11 decline aids Washington corruption
Blurring the line between frivolous tabloid news and serious issues keeps the people ignorant, enslaved
The above snapshot of an internet scroll from earlier today epitomizes our modern media culture. Notice that one of its stories is very serious, as it deals (ostensibly at least) with national security and also deals, quite tangibly, with our civil liberties. Yet it is shuffled together with entertainment-industry gossip.
January 24, 2011
Remember the days when the National Enquirer was America's main source of low-rent journalism? While its content was over the top, most Americans' attitude was, hey, if you don't like the Enquirer then simply don't read it! After all, it was just one publication and most people could easily distinguish it from "real" news.
But then the Enquirer and eventually its copycats began occasionally breaking semi-legitimate news stories, blurring the distinction. Then came Matt Drudge in the 1990s, the man who launched a seedy impeachment trial whose Exibit A was a cum spot. In restrospect it seems pretty clear that the Clinton trial was a controlled demolition of the institution of impeachment itself - which, coincidentally we are sure, ended up proving awfully convenient for the next two criminals-in-chief. It should be noted here also that Clinton's Telecommunications Act in 1996 opened the door to the big media monopolies, which, coincidentally we are sure, ended up proving invaluable in the selling of the official (and laughable) 9/11 conspiracy theory.
Today we have many "news" sources such as The Onion, Jon Stewart, Steven Colbert and Jay Leno all providing real news but with jokes and satire.
On paper it's all perfectly harmless, the presumption being that "fake" news will always be recognizable for what it is. But in today's 24/7/365 information blizzard, how is the average working stiff expected to keep track of every media snowflake? The information overload becomes a blur; truth itself a moving target, which of course benefits those in power as they literally get away with murder while we're all swimming for our lives in a sea of trivial pursuit.
Consequently, even a Watergate or Iran-Contra-caliber scandal would today amount to a passing blip, overshadowed by "coverage" of the big game, American Idol and Jersey Shore.
Our control over government was mortally wounded when it came to pass that even our trusted, legitimate news sources began mixing the frivolous and the serious, juxtaposing real news involving e.g., war deaths, civil rights abuses and the Fed's looting of our retirements with live coverage from Lindsey Lohan's bail hearing or Lady Gaga's latest costume reveal. Just for fun, try watching an old Channel 5 newscast from 20 years ago, or read a circa 1970s edition of the Boston Globe or the Herald American. Find an old tape of WRKO's Gene Burns or WBZ's David Brudnoy. The decline in all media, particulalry since 9/11, is absolutely striking.
So be super careful, Best and Brightest. Do not let the gov-controlled media dumb you down. For as we have been warned, no civilization can be both ignorant and free.
,
Is Mitt Romney a Wall St. Strawman to insure Obama's Reelection?
January 19, 2011
Given the news this week that Mitt Romney shares the same Wall St./bankster campaign contributors as Barack Obama, and given the elephant-in-the-room reality that Romney cannot beat Obama in November unless Ron Paul's conservative grassroots revolution suddenly undergoes a collective liberal lobotomy, and given that despite these facts Romney nonetheless remains the darling of the mainstream media, is it just possible that Romney's candidacy is a Wall Street creation, a preemtive strike at democracy in the form of a strawman candidate who wields unlimited funding to keep any real challenges to brother Obama at bay?
Think of it as an offensive block in football. By sending their ringer/poodle Romney into the GOP primary, the banksters can bump off any serious challenges to golden boy Obama. Then all Mitt needs to do is lose in the general.
Many wondered after the 2004 Ohio election scandal why John Kerry refused to fight for a recount. Perhaps he too was a Wall St. poodle and strawman from the beginning? Think about the stunning similarities between Romney and Kerry. Both are northeast elites, tax-dodging, serial political flip-floppers. Both are obedient yes men for the establishment, unlikeable sellouts to their bases yet wealthy enough to stay competitive in politics, all of which provides media "experts" like Jay Severin their plausible explanations for how and why the even-more-unpopular and unlikable incumbent somehow managed to get reelected.
It appears the puppet masters invest too much in their puppets nowadays to let them off the hook with only four years' service. To ensure two terms, it sure looks like they are designing and propping up fake challegers.
Bonus: Romney Wouldn't Know a Free Market if it Bit Him in the Ass
Can Ron Paul be a Kingmaker?
Poll asks Ron Paul supporters if they would vote for an establishment candidate if Paul asked them to
January 18, 2011
The mainstream media seem to be coming to grips with the fact that the GOP cannot beat Barack Obama without Ron Paul’s supporters. And so it begs the question: if the GOP offered Ron Paul some concessions in exchange for his endorsement of Romney or Gingrich, and if Paul decided to make the deal, would Paul voters follow his direction and vote for a liberal?
It looks like Ron Paul will eventually be forced to bolt the GOP and run on a Libertarian ticket! And don't be surprised if he beats both the Republican AND Obama.
The GOP Primaries become a Referendum on the Constitution itself
Will Republican voters choose Rule of Law or Executive Tyranny? Ron Paul or Mitt Obamney?
January 18, 2011
If you are interested in seeing constitutionalist rock star Ron Paul absolutely destroy his "fiscally conservative" opponents on their uber-liberal foreign spending, watch this video starting around min 8.
That such a godsend candidate could emerge and NOT be immediately embraced by every true American, particularly after all the outrageous bailouts, fraudulent wars, assassinations, indefinite detentions, etc, etc, is worrisome indeed. One wonders what could stir Americans into serious action if eleven years of Bareorge Obusha couldn't?
It is safe to say that the GOP primaries are now a referendum on American liberty and the Constitution itself: Will Republican voters seize on constitutionalist Ron Paul's campaign to retore Rule by Law...or not? Will they favor sold-out Main Street or bailed-out Wall Street? A proven man of the people or a proven flip flopping fraud?
It's your move, Republicans.
Romney = Obama on Indefinite Detentions of Innocent Americans

They are Right: We ARE Dangerous - To the Status Quo!
Cavuto: Why Ron Paul is Obama's Toughest Competitor
The Youth Vote
RINO Romney's Only Real Challenger is Ron Paul
Ron Paul is Incorruptable and Can Beat Obama
Obama's Immoral Wars Undermine the 'Higher Standard' Moral Code of US Marine Corps
Treachery at the Top eventually Infects and Corrupts the morals of those following bad orders
Notice the liberal media's unchecked presumption that the piss-soaked dead guys on the ground must have been guilty of some terrible crime before they were killed. But given all we have learned through Wikileaks, this presumption = bad journalism. For all we know those guys might have been innocent farmers who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time when Obama's yes men felt like having some fun, just like the poor Reuters reporters in the Collateral Murder video. Obama should be impeached and tried for treason!
Ron Paul is the Only One Who is Hawkish on Defending Americans in America
Faking it: How the Media Manipulates the World into War
Soldier who spoke out for Ron Paul could face trouble
Veterans For Ron Paul Announce Presidents' Day March On Obama White House!
As his Insane War Against Iran Looms Dangerously
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0LxI7_v9vA&feature=player_embedded#!
Paul Absolutely Destroys 'Chickenhawk' Gingrich at NH Debate
How pro-war congressmen get so rich: insider trading
LOL: Statesman Paul Mops the Floor with Belligerent RINOs at Saint Anselm
.. ...
,
How Zionism Infiltrated the United States
And how today's Washington deals with it
December 27, 2011
Mark Bruzonsky, a Jewish American Scholar and Journalist, was a key figure behind the scenes of the Israeli/Palestinian peace initiative in the 1980s, meeting with Former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and with Palestinian officials. In this exclusive interview he traces today's headlines back to their historical roots, providing extraordinary insights and details regarding Barack Obama's behavior toward Israel.
Watch here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8jfE1XjgaM
.
Why Does the US Military Support Ron Paul?
Because they Swore an Oath to Defend the Constitution!. ,,. .
New Poll: Constitutionalist Ron Paul Betters RINO Opponents Vs Obama
,
How to Restore the Republic
Alex Jones Speaks with Oath Keepers' Stewart Rhodes and 10th Amendment Center's Michael Boldin
.
Iowa Shmiowa
Sellout Severin will soon claim the Hawkeye State 'doesn't matter'
October 28, 2011
Once upon a time establishment radio jocks like Jay Severin spent interminable hours discussing the "huge significance" of various presidential straw polls and early caucuses, such as the conservative CPAC poll in DC and the Iowa straw poll leading up to the presidential primaries. But notice that these polls suddenly were dubbed "insignificant" by Severin beginning around 10 months ago. The reason why is obvious: Constitutionalist Ron Paul is kicking ass everywhere he goes, exposing the RINO candidates for what they are.
Severin's flip flop on the significance of straw polls may not have been blatant enough to catch the attention of his average listener, but his upcoming back flip on the significance of the actual caucuses in Iowa will finally expose him even to his Worst and Dullest listeners.
Yes, Best and Brightest, this is a rare prediction by us: Jay will soon receive the GOP's oh fuck memo, saying...Ron Paul is doing "too well" in Iowa, therefore radio listeners must be told that Iowa doesn't matter. This is the new MO of the discredited RINOs who hijacked the GOP in the 1990s. Now that America's conservatives are finally shaking off their neocon Kool-aid hangover, the goal posts for defining political success must be moved. mid-game, yet again. And sellout Severin will dutifully play along.
The good news is it's no longer working. Ron Paul's team of genuine patriots has gained far too much yardage now to be stopped, while mainstream tools like Severin have lost listeners and no longer command 6-figure salaries. It's First and Goal for the rEVOLution and there are no time-outs remaining for Severin. After eleven years of claiming he supports the Constitution, Jay's chance to prove it is quickly slipping away.
,
Oh, $#!+! He's Waking Them Up!!
Quick, We need a Sex Scandal!!!
....
Even CNN Liberals are Waking Up! ...
Is there a (real) Doctor In the House?
16 Reasons Why Dr. Romney = Dr. Obama
.
.
Severin Totally Exposed By Paul Campaign
Turns out Jay is No Constitutionalist after all
October 28, 2011
Political "expert" Jay Severin predicted in 2007 that Barack Obama had 'zero chance' of winning the Democrat nomination, because America wasn't ready for his kind. Now he's claiming that constitutionalist Ron Paul has zero chance of winning the GOP nomination, this time because - fair or not - the liberal mainstream media don't like him. When pressed by Best and Brightest callers to give Dr. Paul his due, Severin has been passing the buck, saying it's CNN, Fox, et al. who decide which candidates shall be taken seriously, not little old him!
And for 11 years Severin has been claiming he's a reliable antidote to the establishment media!
It turns out that Ron Paul is more than just a true statesman and great candidate; his campaign is finally exposing all the wolves in sheeps' clothing - the fake conservatives like Jay Severin.
Iraq: It all depends on the definition of 'withdrawal'
m
On the Occupy Movement
Why are mainstream media pundits pretending that Occupy Wall Street represents an uprising against capitalism when there is in fact no capitalism on Wall Street today? Guys like Jay Severin and Michael Graham surely recall that the socialist taxpayer bailouts of the past four years went to Wall Street institutions and other "too-big-to-fails" around the world. So how exactly does receiving trillions in taxpayer bailouts make these institutions synonymous with capitalism? While youthful protesters can be excused for failing to recognize Wall Street's uber socialism, grown-ups like Severin and Graham cannot.
The Big Secret that establishment "conservatives" Severin and Graham don't dare reveal: The Federal Reserve is a Cache of Stolen Assets
Ron Paul to Fox News: 'Maybe telling the truth makes people upbeat!'
Establishment media puzzle over Ron Paul's surging popularity despite his 'unpleasant predictions'
August 14, 2011
On Saturday Neil Cavuto asked Ron Paul a great question about his "doom and gloom" campaign...I.e., his constant complaining about the Federal Reserve's destruction of the US dollar and its crushing inflation tax, Washington's counterproductive foreign policy, etc. Cavuto pointed out that Paul's campaign style violates the conventional rule of presidential politics, which is basically to tell voters what they want to hear, just say America is great and can do no wrong, etc. That's all simple minded Americans really want.
According to Cavuto, Ron Paul's penchant for leveling like an adult with the American people yet still remaining competitive in the GOP race is extremely puzzling to the establishment media. That strategy is not supposed to work! Why the hell is this guy getting so damned popular, even as we work daily to dismiss him as a nut?
Ron Paul's response:
Yes...I do talk about the dangers, how if we keep doing this, how terrible it's going to be, and how horrible these wars are and all the tragedy. But what amazes me is when I talk to people - and I talk to a lot of them - I'm seeing mostly optimism; people are upbeat. It's sort of like, if we declare the truth and know where we are, there's a chance that we'll solve our problems. So they come away as optimists!
I am surprised myself. I keep talking about these negative things and yet everybody gets upbeat...they get excited, because in freedom we can find our answers; in peace we can find prosperity. So it really is an upbeat message. Maybe telling the truth makes people upbeat.
Yup : )
,,,,
Patriotism is the Last Refuge of an Idiot
June 09, 2011
While Dr Johnson was no doubt correct when he wrote that "patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel," he just as easily could have written that patriotism is the last refuge of an idiot. The latter phrasing is arguably more useful to commit to memory, given the higher likelihood of bumping into patriotic idiots on the street than of bumping into patriotic scoundrels (outside of Washington, DC and New York, of course) Full article
Bin Laden's Epitaph:
Here Lies a Man who was Never Even Wanted for 9/11
May 3, 2011
Aside from the fact that even George W Bush himself said Osama bin Laden's whereabouts didn't concern him much, there's more reason to feel foolish if you wasted time this week celebrating Barack Obama's latest act of unjustifiable aggression; his alleged killing and lightening-quick disposal of Osama bin Laden -- conveniently in a location where he can never be dug up and examined.
It's no secret that bin Laden is an old CIA asset from the days of the Mujahideen; a by-product of the Cold War who reportedly worked for Washington right up until 9/11. So why would any sane American automatically believe a Washington-bred story like this one, particularly given its exceedingly shady history?
But even more embarrassing for all you pro-Obama party animals is the inconvenient fact that bin Laden died having never been so much as accused of participation in 9/11's conspiracy, nevermind convicted of being its actual mastermind!
Here is the FBI's (newly updated) Most Wanted web page for bin Laden. After 10 obscenely costly years of "retaliations" in this guy's name, there is still no mention of 9/11 on his official list of alleged crimes.
So Emperor Obama has just hunted down and murdered an innocent man, just to make himself look "tough" in time for 2012. He was innocent if you subscribe, as we still do, to America's timeless legal traditions of rules of evidence and the presumption of innocence.
No president, no matter how popular, has the constitutional authority to go around assassinating people without due process of law. But your new hero-buddy Barack Obama went and did it anyway, and you loved it!
Wow, that's going to be one nasty party hangover for all you new Obamabots. Too much Hope and Change in one night for you poor inexperienced newbies. Next time better go easy on the kool-aid.
Banker-controlled Government Can't Figure Out How to Prosecute Bankers
April 15, 2011
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said on Wednesday that Goldman Sachs “misled investors selling mortgage-backed investments it knew would fail” and that executives from the bank had also “misled Congress in a testimony given in 2010.” And now all the thieving, lying bankers who ruined America will be sent to... Story here.
Why establishmentarians like Severin are so afraid of Ron Paul's R3VOLution
Paul is the only real Republican who knows how to Unite rather than Divide Americans
Video: Ron Paul masterfully demonstrates how to deal with commies like Ralph Nader
January 22, 2011
Jay Severin's establishment media works 24/7 trying to trick Americans into beating each other up rather than defeating our real, common enemy. To Severin, everything is to be couched in terms of Left vs Right. Blue vs Red. Liberal vs Conservative. Tea Party vs Progressive. DEM vs GOP, etc. If radio and TV programmers can just keep us lowly sheople bickering amongst ourselves, then those in power can go on freely robbing us blind and chipping away at our ever-shrinking freedoms. This is why Ron Paul is so dangerous to Washington and why Mockingbird radio hacks like Jay Severin routinely advise their audiences to ignore his growing revolution. True to form, Severin told his listeners on Friday that supporting Ron Paul is a waste of time for tea party activists; that pro-war Sarah Palin is the only tea party politician who has any chance. (Oops...wrong again, Jay.)
What a difference 4 years makes
Back in 2007 when Paul's freedom movement first burst onto the scene, Severin would go so far as to ridicule the strict constitutionalist, even dismissing him as "Ru Paul." But these days, Jay knows his audience is older and wiser than they were four years ago; these days, Severin knows he must sweeten his anti-Paul rhetoric with patronizing words of praise for his decades of tireless hard work in the cause of freedom. This concession by Severin just serves to further prove he's wrong about the viability of Paul's conservative and antiwar message; it signifies that the rEVOLution has advanced successfully, despite Jay's best efforts at tearing us down.
In the meantime, Severin continues to push anti-Tea Party Mitt "Socialized Medicine" Romney, a man so liberal that he thinks Palin's watered down version of Paul's Tea Party is too conservative. So Severin can claim all he wants that he is a constitutionalist; he isn't fooling us Best and Brightest. The only reason he touts Palin as THE tea party favorite is because he knows his liberal RINO candidate can more easily beat her in a GOP primary than he can beat a true statesman like Ron Paul.
Severin claims to represent the "loyal opposition." But judging by his actual behavior, it is clear that he is closer to being classic Faux Opposition.
Fake Terror
How Severin, Michael Graham and Barack Obama dupe Americans into fearing Muslims and accepting a police state
This guy masterfully shows that virtually every "Muslim terrorist" arrested in the US in the past several years was either FBI-cultivated from the beginning or was helped by "well-dressed" accomplices. The so-called 'war on terror,' it turns out, is a big-government boondoggle of unbelievable proportions. Guys like Jay Severin and Michael Graham are apparently paid propagandists, political operatives who earned their treacherous stripes by kissing political ass throughout the '90s. Now they've been rewarded with cushy talk radio gigs where all they have to do is parrot the neocons' pro-war talking points and lies about Islam -- all while pretending to oppose the very Big Government they've helped to create. It turns out that President Bill Clinton paved the way for this liberal-neocon takeover of radio and television when he "deregulated" telecommunications back in 1996, allowing "conservative" ideologues to consolidate mainstream media. Then, conveniently, the Lewinsky BJ scandal errupted, transforming the sacred institution of impeachment into a sex joke, all just in time for Clinton's "stupid" brother Dubya to take over the presidency and use his guaranteed eight years to attack the Bill of Rights without any worries of being impeached.
Folks, they don't call it "programming" for nothing. We are being lied to daily by Severin and Graham...and by virtually everyone else spouting "opinions" across our "deregulated" mass media these days. Muslims, it turns out, are the very least of our problems!
Update: Eric Holder now says radicalized Americans the big threat
Another Holiday Weekend, Another Clueless Patsy Proves 'need' for Big Sis
Mohamed Osman Mohamud
November 28, 2010
Fear is the name of the game when it comes to duping people out of their freedoms. As Jay Severin loves to remind us, "so far, all of the terrorists have been Muslims." Yes, Jay, and right on cue, we see the latest FBI-cultivated "jihadist" being trotted out just in time for Thanksgiving weekend. Is anyone buying this obvious BS anymore?
Guilty Until Proven Guilty II
White House stubbornness could lead to Fort Hood Acquittal next
Nidal Hasan
November 20, 2010
The Obama administration is refusing to disclose key evidence that could help the defense team of alleged Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan. In post-9/11 terror trials, the government has been attempting to gut America's traditional system of justice, by disallowing full discoveries of evidence, especially that which might be helpful to the defense. The trouble is, when American jurors learn that exculpatory evidence is being withheld, they tend to become suspicious and punish the prosecution with verdicts of not guilty.
So the question is, what evidence could possibly be so embarrassing to Team Obama that they would risk yet more terror-case acquittals?
Guilty Until Proven Guilty
Why Obama's terror trials are an embarrassing joke
November 19, 2010
Despite the predictable whining and spinning from the left and right regarding the Ahmed Ghailani terror verdicts, the trial was a meaningless exercise from the beginning. Why? Because in advance Barack Obama had claimed the power to imprison him (or anyone else accused of terrorism) for life, even if he was to be acquitted on every charge.
That's right; even if this trial had shown that Ghailani was 100% innocent, he still likely would have been forced to remain behind bars for life.
Jay "pure libertarian" Severin no doubt approves of Obama's dictatorial power grab in cases like Ghailani's, but just wait until Obama tries applying his stolen authority in ways Jay disapproves of.
To read a true constitutionalist's summary of the Ghailani trial, see the great Glenn Greenwald.
How the Federal Government Got its Sleazy Hands on our Junk
AP: More CIA Interrogation Tapes 'Found Under a Desk'
August 19, 2010
Not mentioned in this obvious AP propaganda piece is the outrage expressed by several 9/11 commissioners after having learned of all those earlier CIA interrogation tapes that had illegally been kept from them during their 2003 investigation. By early 2008, Commission co-chairs Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton were publicly accusing the CIA and the White House of "obstruction," for their withholding/destroying the critical audio evidence of the 9/11 interrogations. Now the AP is saying that yet more tapes have magically appeared "under a desk" at some CIA gulag in Morocco. How much would you care to bet that if this newly "discovered" audio evidence is ever heard in a US court room, it will be said to "prove" once and for all that no torture whatsoever has been used against any accused 9/11 conspirators. Any "terrorists" on these new tapes will probably be heard enjoying milk and cookies, being sung sweet lullabies by their way-too-soft interrogators. Otherwise, you can be damned sure these tapes would never have been "found."
It appears the AP has been caught once again aiding and abetting the enemy. This is just the kind of new 9/11 "evidence" that (the establishment believes) will lend at least a morsel of credence to their so-called cases against the G'tmo Five, who outrageosuly still languish in Cuba without so much as a single charge against them.
More stories