No showing images of the actual 'collapses'!!
Before towers exploded After towers exploded During explosions
OK to show OK to show Absolutely FORBIDDEN!!!!
November 14 2009
With the news that Bush 44 is planning to bring a small number of Gtmo detainees to New York for trial, the approved media have dutifully been working overtime to reignite the raw emotion and passion that gripped America eight years ago, by airing lots of pictures and videos from that terrible day, alongside scary pics of that hairy dude who "everyone knows" did it.
But notice that every 9-11 photo and video they're using now depicts either what happened before or what happened after the twin towers dropped to earth like two giant fistfuls of sand. Be assured that none of the 9-11 visuals chosen to accompany these trials will show the actual moments of "collapse." Why? Because the government's media doesn't want you remembering anything in this video or this video or (gasp!), this video. For if the video evidence of 9-11's demolitions were to start replaying now, after 8 years of constant lies out of Washington, the establishment might finally be forced to explain how their scary hairy dude somehow managed to sneak massive quantities of high-tech explosives past WTC security.
The only mystery remaining for us Best and Brightest is: what the heck is 44's real motive for bringing KSM to New York??? Is this just the latest neocon charade -- another premeditated "screwup" that will conveniently explain away the next false flag?
Passengers: Government is lying about Flight 253
Couple saw who helped underwear bomber onto plane; accuses FBI's Ron Smith of blatant coverup
Kurt and Lori Haskell
December 31, 2009
Flight 253 passengers Kurt and Lori Haskell have a message for the American people regarding their recent brush with death, what they heard and saw and how the (ever-changing) official story is a gross fabrication. You won't find this story on CNN or Fox News...or hear it talked about on WTKK or WRKO. All the state-approved media are in total lockdown, reporting only what the government is telling them to report. To get at the real truth we must, as always, turn to the internet. See Kurt Haskell's written statement here.Happy Veterans Day. All troops home, yesterday!
'Libertarian' Severin favors forced allegiance to Washington
Why is Leftist Francis Bellamy's ode to commie nationalism so popular with "freedom" advocates like Jay Severin?
October 05, 2009
Jay Severin officially sided on Monday with those who say American youth ought to be forced to recite Rev. Francis Bellamy's commie pledge of allegiance to government rather than to individual liberty and personal responsibility.
While Severin did choke on the "under God" requirement just a bit, he ended up acquiescing even to that, out of deference to the overall glory and splendor of pledge, and to its wise and honorable originator.
Here we have a "libertarian" talk host telling his listeners that a central government somehow has a moral right to force pledges of allegiance out of its subjects. With conservatives like Severin, who needs fascists? Who needs religious mullahs?
The truth is, even if the pledge of allegiance hadn't been written by a flaming socialist, even if it were the finest, most patriotic pledge ever written, no child (especially no American child) should ever be forced by government bureaucrats to "pledge allegiance" to government!
Severin is distorting the definition of "libertarian" almost daily, just as fellow-neocon George W Bush distorted the word "conservative" for eight treasonous years. If you want a true libertarian perspective, see Why Small Government and/or Why Not Big Government.
Glenn Beck's tirade against 9-11 movement contained good questions
September 12, 2009
Fox News Channel's Glenn Beck routinely shills for the government's 9-11 conspiracy theory, declaring that anyone who questions it is "un-American." Guys like Beck and Jay Severin do everything in their power to prop up the official line and ridicule the skeptics. But, ironically, Beck's recent anti-911 movement rant only demonstrated the movement's success, as Beck was compelled to frame his tirade around several of the movement's own questions about 9-11. Watch this.
Who'da thunk it: Romneycare is just another Hackorama
Just 3 years in, Mitt's 'model' government program is sucked into Big Government's inescapable void
2006: Drooling liberals hover over Mitt Romney as he ushers in government-run health care in America
August 6 ,2009
For three years, we Best and Brightest have tried to explain to Jay Severin why Romneycare disqualified Mitt Romney from ever being president of these United States. But Jay apparently loved his buddy Mitt so much that he was willing to overlook Romney's cardinal sin of pioneering Obamacare.
Severin was honest enough in the beginning to admit Romneycare was socialist, but he defended it anyway saying it would be "less bad" than if a Democrat had been first to let government in. We disagreed sharply, observing that Romneycare would be seized upon by the Democrats as a catalyst for "change." The Dems would, no doubt, take Romney's "less-bad" program and run with it!
Three years hence we can already see that we Best and Brightest were right and Jay was foolish, unless of course his real motivation for kissing Romney's commie butt had been unknown to us listeners. E.g., perhaps Jay was secretly having grand visions of being Press Secretary in a Romney White House? Just saying...
We also warned Severin that Romneycare would suffer the same shameful fate as every other Big Government program in the history of man: I.e., it would become just another hackorama for the politically connected.
As it turns out, the Five Iron Laws of Big Government don't magically stop working just because it's a "Republican" making government bigger.
Should police have the power to arrest you in your own home...for 'yelling' at them?
Bad arrest in Cambridge reminds us cops are only human
Did Sgt. Crowley let his personal emotions affect his professional behavior?
July 25, 2009
The most salient, undisputed fact to emerge in Sgt. James Crowley's controversial burglary-call arrest on July 16th is the fact that he knew the person he was arresting was not a burglar.
His defenders say Sgt. Crowley "tried to leave" the private residence after realizing no burglary was in fact occurring, but, unfortunately, an angry resident at the address "kept yelling at him."
TRIED to leave?
Did the angry resident's tirade somehow carry with it a magic power to prevent Sgt. Crowley from acting prudently? Of course not; he still could have left the scene the moment he realized there was no crime occurring at that address, regardless of what the upset resident was saying about him -- or his mama.
One of the biggest challenges that peace officers face is the need to resist taking personally the verbal abuse that comes with the job. No cop is perfect, however; there are bound to be instances when an agitated citizen manages to push just the right emotional button of an officer, leading some to unprofessionally reach into their legal bag o' tricks and vengefully pull out the notoriously weak, catch-all charge of "disorderly conduct."
But just because we know cops sometimes fall prey to this temptation, that doesn't mean talk radio ought to celebrate it as some kind of virtue.
The Crowley controversy appears to be a classic case of disorderly-conduct syndrome: in a moment of weakness, a police sergeant allowed himself to take personally a citizen's disrespectful tone.
A lesson learned?
Next time Cambridge peace officers find themselves inside the home of an innocent person who, reasonably or unreasonably, becomes agitated by the government's mistaken encroachment into the private residence, we hope they will show the strength of character becoming of a peace officer: be bigger than the agitated resident. Next time simply apologize, walk away, and go to the next 911 call, which will hopefully be just another false alarm requiring nothing more of the officer than a little thick skin.
Is Associated Press involved in a government hoax?
Official AP source of captured soldier video keeps changing, without retractions or corrections
July 20, 2009
As we reported yesterday, the AP wrote a news story over the weekend claiming the video of captured US soldier Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl was first posted at "the Taliban website." We noticed right away that no link was provided to verify the story, and then we found that no such "Taliban website" appears even to exist!
Oops.
Today the AP changed its story. It no longer says the video originated at "the Taliban's website." Now they claim the video was posted at "a website pointed out by the Taliban."
Wow. That is a big difference, one which should've required an official correction by the AP, but no correction has been issued. And worse, the editors provide no URL to back up even their new claim, i.e., that the Taliban "pointed out" the video's original URL. This new twist not only fails to provide us the primary URL, it begs the additional question of who contacted whom (and how) during this "pointing out" of the video's originator.
Fishier still is this more recent AP story which quite cleverly makes no allusion whatsoever to the owner of the video, instead assigning a possessive apostrophe to a day of the week rather than to a tangible entity: "Only after Saturday's internet airing of a 28-minute video in which..."
So now we learn from the AP that the original video was "aired on the internet" by "Saturday."
This is either unbelievably shoddy journalism or the Associated Press is engaging in some type of shady activity with the government. After all, identifying the origin of the video should be a crucial part of this investigation.
Ha Ha Ha!
Fox News now thinks 9-11 is funny?!
July 06, 2009
Fox "News" Channel is evidently in a panic over the growing success of the 9-11 movement. They'd clearly hoped that trying to ignore us would make us go away. But, oops, we haven't. Which apparently requires a Plan B.
Enter laughter
Fox News is now treating 9-11 justice as "joke material."
Watch as the zany Fox host and his knee-slapping guests try their best to laugh off the rising tide of questions about the official story, using kindergarten-level humor to dismiss people who've courageously gone public with their skepticism toward Barack W Bush's wacky 9-11 conspiracy theory.
Congratulations to the 9-11 movement for this latest success in showing a mainstream medium for the complicit shill it is.
To Fox News, we say please keep laughing at 9-11. Please keep trash-talking the skeptics without discussing any of the devastating evidence brought forward by highly credible researchers and brave government officials. Please keep focusing only on Hollywood celebs who speak out on the controversy. Be careful to never mention the hundreds of serious military, intelligence & law enforcement officials or the architectural and engineering professionals who have stepped forward. Never acknowledge the fact that conservatives like us Best and Brightest are also demanding an end to the 9-11 coverup.
Ha Ha Ha, right, Fox News?
Your utter contempt for justice in this case is clear evidence of your complicity, and of the truth's impending victory. So keep laughing.
Briton arrested for distributing '7/7 truth' DVDs
Documentary proves official conspiracy theory false; government cracks down on truth telling
July 05, 2009
The British government is in deep trouble, as its citizenry begins waking up to what really happened on 7/7/05.
Like its American 9/11 counterpart, the British government's official conspiracy theory for 7/7 is so riddled with holes and inconsistencies that the panicked government there has now arrested a man for the "crime" of distributing a DVD documentary that questions the official line. Apparently, disagreeing with the government in the age of the "war on terror" is too "dangerous" to allow in Britain.
At least we Americans are still free to disseminate troubling facts and hard scientific evidence on 9/11, and to reveal the real motive for the war.
Chemtrails are real
And they're completely illegal
See the inside of a chemtrail airplane Meteorologist confirms
June 28, 2009
There's no doubt that our skies are occasionally being poisoned by some kind of federal aerosol spraying program. The only questions are: What's being sprayed on us? Why? Is it responsible for the recent die-offs of bees and/or bats? Is it harmful to humans?
Some observers believe chemtrails are another example of the government testing chemical agents on innocent populations, while others believe the program is a top-secret attempt to shade/cool the earth. Still others believe chemtrails are part of the HAARP program.
But regardless of the program's purpose, the central government has no right to spray you and your property without your informed consent. So the program is illegal.
Will the real Osama bin Laden please stand up?
Original Osama: New, improved Osama:
"No, I didn't do it" "Yes, I did it"
June 26, 2009
Defenders of President Barack Obama's official 9-11 explanation love to remind us that CIA asset Osama bin Laden proudly admitted to engineering the 9-11 attacks.
Case closed, right?
Wrong.
Trouble is, the "Osama bin Laden" who supposedly confessed to 9-11 appeared quite different from the original Osama who'd been hired by Washington in the 1980s as a "freedom fighter" against the Soviets. The original Osama reportedly denied having had any knowledge of the 9-11 plot whatsoever. So we have two Osama bin Ladens; one a proud anti-American terrorist and the other a patsy who was set up to take the blame for 9-11.
Which Osama should we believe?
From looking at the FBI's opinion on this controversy, it is clear which Osama is telling the truth. Just don't hold your breath waiting for Jay Severin or Barack Obama to mention the fact that bin Laden is not even wanted for 9-11.
Why JFK was assassinated How JFK was assassinated
Executive Order 11110 challenged the Federal Say WHAT?!!
Reserve banksters Why are you ordering me off the president's car???
June 22, 2009
Having learned the ugly truth about the thieving federal government -- its secret backroom dealings and fake left/right paradigm; its CIA black operations, shadow-government puppeteering, false flag attacks and wars for empire -- we can see more clearly than ever that President John F Kennedy was killed not by some crazed, lone nut, but rather by a rogue faction within the U.S. government that felt threatened by Kennedy's honesty.
One of the more plausible motives for JFK's killing, then, was his extremely gutsy move in June of 1963, his signing of Executive Order #11110, a major frontal assault against the Federal Reserve banking scam.
It appears that messing with the private banksters can be hazardous to a president's health!
The joke's on you, America
The Dems were against military tribunals...before they were for them!
Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama decide to keep the change after all
May 18, 2009
The Military Industrial Complex's apparent support for politicians like Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama may have seemed strange at first, but it's making perfect sense today. These ostensible agents of hope and change were evidently just a couple of neo-con artists, paid actors if you will, pretending to embody everything voters were demanding after George Bush's nightmarish reign. They are the neocons' elixir, a sweetener added to the foul-tasting Bush-era policies and power grabs to make them go down easier.
It turns out that neocons don't much care which party they have to hijack to have their wars.
The Democrats' latest flip flop is a particularly dangerous one; the decision to carry forward Bush/Cheney's Gitmo-style military tribunals, where bogus confessions blurted out by terrified detainees are taken as gospel by the politicians, and then swallowed whole and regurgitated over and over by media shills like Jay Severin and Michael Graham.
Bush Doctrine of Unequal Justice upheld by Dems
So the Big 2 Democrats are "reluctantly" agreeing with the Bush administration's claim that anyone even accused of having ties to terrorism must immediately be stripped of her right to basic constitutional protections, such as habeas corpus. Of course Pelosi's and Obama's interpretation of who might be a terrorist - and therefore who will be "permitted" to keep his constitutional rights - is far different from the average American's interpretation. Heck, even you might be a terrorist to their thinking, if you're "too patriotic."
Torture is merely a symptom of a much larger sickness (but the media can never tell you this)
The Establishment Media has long understood that if they can just get the public debating the wrong questions, then they won't need to worry about the answers. The current media "debate" over the post-9-11 torture program is a classic example, as it was evidently intended to deflect our attention away from how true Western criminal justice works.
Our media gatekeepers want us to believe that torture is somehow a dilemma in and of itself, some difficult ethics question to be haggled over endlessly by "legal experts." But in reality torture is but a symptom. Western civilization long ago realized that torture doesn't work, as those being tortured will do or say virtually anything to stop the brutal abuses being put to them.
So the fact that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, for example, had to be waterboarded 183 times before he finally "confessed to 9-11" is a huge red flag that something is radically wrong with the current 9-11 legal proceedings. I.e., they're not legal. Far from signifying certainty of his guilt, the fact that it took so much horrendous abuse of this man to make him confess signifies the exact opposite; serious doubt about his guilt. Yet, we're all nevertheless expected to blindly assume that tortured confessions are somehow legit.
Obstruction of Justice is the real, unspoken issue
So if torture is just a symptom of a wider disease, then what is the wider disease? Surely it is Obstruction of Justice. You can bet that whenever any western government is resorting to torture in order to claim successful convictions in a criminal case, a major coverup must be underway. For during any serious government coverup, the politicians will always do their damndest to sidestep and tapdance around the best and fairest system of jurisprudence ever devised by man, lest they themselves end up wearing the orange jump suits. The truth is, the politicians and their suckups in the media are using "the torture issue" as a means of evading 9-11 justice, of keeping what really happened on 9-11 from spilling out even more than it already has.
Reagan opposed torture and inhumane treatment in all situations
So how come The Gipper's principled conservativism is now considered 'Far Left'?
Ronald Wilson Reagan
May 01, 2009
Despite having to deal with radicalized Middle Easterners of his own back in the early 1980s, Republican President Ronald Reagan championed the world-wide ban on torture, calling it an "abhorrent practice" that must be prosecuted in all instances.
Perhaps Reagan understood what seasoned CIA investigators have been trying to tell Washington since 9-11: coerced confessions are worse than merely worthless; they counterproductively send agents on wild goose chases around the globe, allowing the truly guilty to escape justice.
Severin claims 'tens of millions' of pro-Jihad Muslims
November 11 2009
Jay Severin was careful on Wednesday to stipulate that Islam, as a religion, per se, is not evil (no shit, really Jay??). However, he also claimed that "tens of millions, if not a hundred million" Muslims around the world are inclined toward violence in service of their god. This (totally unsubstantiated) claim by Severin is clearly absurd, given the relatively low number of genuine "jihadist" attacks that have occured in the last, say, ten years. The vast majority of Muslim violence has occurred within occupied territories, where Severin himself admits they're only doing what our own rag-tag Minute Men did back in the day to oust the impirialist Brits. It has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with the Natural Right to self-determination.
Even 9-11 can't be counted as a confirmed jihadist attack, and won't count until Decider Obama finally admits that explosives leveled all three WTC towers that day. If it turns out he can explain how Muslims might have planted them, fine; we're all ears. But his (and Severin's) continued denial of this proven reality frankly makes us suspicious of them.
Jay calls the kettle black, again
Moreover, notice Severin's typical refusal to discuss the fact that murderous religious fanaticism runs rampant in America, too. E.g., rabidly pro-war "Christain" nut jobs who buy up Sunday morning TV spots to agitate for WW3 so they can be swept up by their long-awaited "Rapture" have $omehow managed to get awfully close to White House politics. The truth is, these so-called Christians, who've been for decades affecting American elections and needlessly sacrificing brave young Americans for their silly crusade, have far more blood on their evil, zionist hands than someone like (the recently-promoted) Major Hasan could've ever dreamed of having on his.
